• What indeed has Athens to do with Jerusalem? What concord is there between the Academy and the Church?
    The famous line
    1. However, it is a fundamental human right, a privilege of nature, that every man should worship according to his own convictions: one man’s religion neither harms nor helps another man. It is assuredly
      Tertullian on religious liberty
      1. His argument is interesting. 1. He bases religious freedom upon Natural Law, He likely derived this principle from the scripture, yet seems to argue this principle on philosophic grounds since even his opponents should recognize this principle. 2. He affirms that other so-called gods are demonic in origin. Therefore, all religions, other than Christianity, are equidistant from the true God. 3. The statement "one man's religion neither harms nor helps another man." I understand the consequent of inability to "compel religion." At the most basic level, I disagree that religion neither harms nor helps. For example, the history of the church affirms the good things (and bad0 done in the name of Christ. For example, hospitals, Braille, and the motivations of religious people in disaster relief. Yet, religion can harm - witness radical Islam in our day and the Inquisitions in "Christian" history.
      2. Well said, professor.
    2. What has Athens to do with Jerusalem? Does this quote value philosophy? 1. seek to understand the condition of faith? 2. the reasons of the truth? 3. Does the "pleasures of the public shows" include Super Bowl?
      1. To both things, perhaps, some among you are allured by the views of the heathens who in this matter are wont to press us with arguments, such as these: (1) That the exquisite enjoyments of ear and eye
        The thesis of DE SPECTACULIS (the shows)
        1. But
          The the thesis of DE SPECTACULIS (The shows)
          1. I am reading through Tertullian at the moment. Any interest in reading with me?