Digital Logos Edition
T. F. Torrance is widely recognized as one of our most important twentieth-century theologians. Scholars of Torrance suggest that Reality & Scientific Theology is one of his most accessible works. Torrance’s insights on Christian epistemology are remarkably relevant in light of recent discussions on realism and anti-realism in philosophy and theology. Torrance brilliantly sets forth no naive or even critical realism, but rather an evangelical realism—knowledge grounded in the revelation of God in Jesus Christ. He not only constructively argues the case for an evangelical realism but compares and contrasts theological knowledge with natural scientific knowledge, and shows how the Bible can function authoritatively in a fragmented church. This edition of Reality and Evangelical Theology includes an in-depth foreword that contextualizes Torrance’s seminal theological work in light of recent debates over postmodern and postcritical hermeneutics to Scripture. It will handsomely repay engagement (or reengagement) by theologians, philosophers, students and thoughtful pastors.
“Thus the phenomenalist assumption that there is nothing in the mind except what was first in the senses, together with a dualist theory of knowledge in which empirical and theoretical factors are externally connected together, has had to be rejected and a realist, unitary theory of knowledge in which empirical and theoretical factors are held to inhere inseparably in one another has taken its place. At the same time the ultimate belief in the reality and intelligibility of the universe independent of our perceiving and conceiving of it, together with a profound recognition of its contingent nature, has been massively reinforced.” (Pages 55–56)
“Christian theology arises within and is bounded by a triadic relation in which God, man, and world are involved together in a movement of God’s personal and creative interaction with man whereby he makes himself known to him within the objectivities and intelligibilities of the empirical world. We have also considered the fact that if we abandon a phenomenalist and observationalist theory of knowledge and its damaging bifurcation between sign and reality signified and between form and content, we return to a more natural and realist view of signification and communication in which language is used and understood through its semantic function in objective reference to realities independent of it.” (Page 84)
“Hence if we are properly to interpret and understand biblical statements, we must learn to trace back their objective reference beyond what is written to their source in the infinite depth of Truth in the Being of God, and if we are to do that we must follow the economic line of divine action that gave rise to them in space and time and continues to govern their meaning.” (Page 109)