• The update went too far, took the place of man and made into persons; 'brothers and sisters" was unnecessary since a footnote would have solved the issue of distinction. It changed strong words like iniquity and transgression for a softer word "wrongdoing." On the long run, it watered the great NASB 1995 into nothing but a translation for the neophyte. As always, it will go down the bottom of the list with the horrible LSB that abused the Name and made it into common word while the Jews were fearful of using the Holy Name. Adonai would have been been more plausible.
    1. Mr Luna makes some significant points.
  • Great translation, but I am disappointed that Christ's words are not in red. What's up with that? Will there be an update or is it going to remain as is?
    1. I can confirm that there will be an update so that Christ's words can be displayed in red.
  • I’m sure we are very close for the release of the LSB, but the question remains…
    1. If I had to guess, I would say that the release of Logos 10 is where much of Faithlife's attention is right now. I would be surprised if the LSB is released before Oct. 10.
    2. You are probably correct. I assume that Logos 10 comes in November; if it does, it might include the LSB "as an extra."
  • How long will it take to get to the interlinear?
    1. I'm a faithful follower of the NASB, but I'm disappointed with the coming new update changes in 2021. My interest has now moved to the MEV, but I need to know if Logos has begun to work on the reverse-interlinear. If there are no plans for it, please let me know. Thank you.
      1. I emailed them about it a couple years ago and they were waiting to see how wide an acceptance the translation would receive before investing in a R-I. I’m hoping it’s in the works by now.
      2. Any updates here? How do you like the translation? I too am disappointed in the nasb 2020...
      3. They have aligned the MEV with the KJV reverse-interlinear. It’s working pretty well!
    2. Number one, there are no promises about to the land to Israel in the NT; number two, nowhere in the NT do we read that Israel continues to be called “chosen”, and, number three, modern Israel has no connection to God because they continue to reject the Lord of Glory (1Cor. 2:8) Therefore, I must believe that only a people of faith (in Christ) chosen before the foundation of the world as Eph. 1:4 states, are the only ones who have the right to be called "chosen." Ephesians 2:11-22 makes it abundantly clear that Jesus broke down the barrier of the dividing wall between Jews and Gentiles (v:14), so why are we trying to rebuild it right back up when Christ through His blood made both people one (v:14)? There is no basis in the scriptures and there is no valid reason to believe that an ungodly nation such as modern “Israel” stills awaits some sort of promise that was fulfilled by their own Messiah at the cross. Jesus redeemed the whole world at the cross through His blood, including old covenant Israel. As for the Jews, the ball has been on their court for a little over 2,000 years which includes the political nation that formed in 1948 which we call “Israel.” So unless they respond to the gospel, they will remain lost and will die in their sins. By the way, the new covenant congregation is God’s final plan for all people of all nations which included old covenant Israel. This is the reason why Jesus, from the very beginning of His ministry, began to call disciples out of Israel in order to include them in the kingdom of God. The term “called out” means church in English (Ekklesia). In my opinion, the new covenant congregation would be a better term than using the noun “church” because clarifies the fact that the church was a continuation of old Israel as a people of faith who were called to inherit all the promises of God through faith in Jesus Christ. The truth of the matter is that without faith it is impossible to please God and he who does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to Him (Heb. 11:6; Rom. 8:9). This is not Replacement Theology folks, so please do not accuse me of saying that the church replaces Israel. No, the church was the final leg of God's plan for Israel which included all the nations of the world. The old congregation (the church in the wilderness, Acts 7:38) are united to the new covenant congregation through Christ our Lord. Ephesians 4:4–6 (NASB95) 4 "There is one body and one Spirit, just as also you were called in one hope of your calling; 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism, 6 one God and Father of all who is over all and through all and in all."
      1. "there are no promises about to the land to Israel in the NT" I am not a dispensationalist, but can you point me to any NT passages that say the promise of "forever" is no longer forever?