David Leslie Bond
- I notice and enjoy the hermeneutical perspective of the commentators for the initial released volumes. Their theological commitments ARE consistent with the task they were entrusted on each commentary so far. However, since there have been changes in both editors and prospective authors, it is becomimg clear that the new editors and the new authors do *not* all uphold the original commitments for which I paid full price for the series more than a decade ago. It was difficult enough not being able to access the promised commentaries or equivalents with the large sum which I originally paid. But, now, we are gradually discovering to our shock, after all this time, that the new replacement authors/editors do not even represent the same theological exegetical tradition for which we paid! Could this please be addressed in an honourable and honest way for the sake of those who purchased the EEC set in the past in good faith!?
- I am sorry to hear of your disappointment. You seem to be suggesting a global, across-the-board approach for this, but not all customers share your view. I recommend that you, or anyone with similar concerns, contact our Customer Service Department directly at cs@logos.com.
- I agree 100% with you.
- Dear Joe, of course it's true that not all commentary purchasers would share my preferences/values regarding innerrancy and also a recent space-time historical creation and fall. That's so obvious that it does not even bear stating. But what does bear repeating, is that specific authors with specific theological commitments were originally advertized. And on *that* basis14 or so years ago, I paid up in good faith for what was advertized without caveat. It's not that it's emotionally disappointing for me not to have my preferences met because others don't agree. Rather instead, it's ethically "disappointing behaviour" on the part of whoever executively changed both authorial perspectives AND publication dates without the consent of those who have paid in good faith for particular commitments (both theologically and temporally speaking).
- Excellent ...and much needed
- Historic landmark in C20th hermeneutical studies
