• This is an excellent resource. The links to footnotes and other resources within the volume make the electronic addition more than worth it. However, the errors with importing B.C. and A.D. have not been fixed, and a careful eye is needed when reading all dates.
    1. I checked quite a few dates in this book and have found them to be correct. If it is not too much trouble, I would appreciate it very much of you could send us a couple of examples or incorrect dates, so that we can have them corrected. You can reach us at customerservice@logos.com.
  • The information in this volume is wonderful. However, the hyperlinks need review. For example, the hyper links to many of the parenthesis are going to the following explanation, "parentheses indicate the presence of a negligible difference in the witness of the enclosed manuscript to the reading attested." However, this is only true when discussing an insignificant difference. When a significant difference is being referenced the variant is preceded by the pertinent witness (see Acts 10:11 and p11–12). It appears that many of the parentheses in this apparatus have this same hyper link even when a more significant variant is in view. This is potentially misleading and does not reflect the actual information in the apparatus. There are other humorous instances of odd hyperlinks such as linking a D rating to Codex Bezae in the Master list of symbols. A scholarly work of this gravity needs better final production editing.
    1. Thank you for reporting your concerns. Our team will be investigating these issues further.
  • This book has very good content. However the published form in Logos is in really rough shape. All the footnote links past chapter 1 link back to chapter 1 rather than the appropriate chapter. Many of the scripture references are not hyper linked, and many that are linked are connected to the wrong Bible verse. The book does not provide page numbers so it is difficult to cite with accuracy. Putting all that together it is very difficult to use as a scholarly source.
    1. Please accept my apologies , I have reported this to our team so that our team can improve this resource.