• Jump on this resource! If Logos tags this grammar well, it will provide an excellent bridge between multiple Hebrew grammars. Beckman's update of Williams not only reviews Hebrew syntax, it also clues the reader into relevant discussions in many of the major Hebrew Grammars available at the time it was published.
    1. The book is great, but I do hope that Logos creates an enhanced Logos edition of this magisterial systematic theology from one of the leading voices in Pentecostal scholarship!
      1. The resource is great addition for anyone interested in how the OT was received in early Judaism and Christianity. I hope it stands as another reason for Logos to acquire more rabbinic literature! My main criticism is that this resource would be best hyperlinked and constructed like a commentary (with milestones for each biblical reference) so that it can automatically scroll with biblical texts. Given that a large portion of the OT is covered (as well as a few NT passages) it would be great if it could be made part of a link-set so that it would track with other texts.
        1. We are now working on an update for this resource, taking into account the issues that you and other reviewers have raised.
        2. Thank you Mr. Darlack, for your recommendation!
        3. : If you purchased this resource, then any updates that come out to the resource should be automatically added.
      2. I'm super-happy to see this work finally translated into English (and with an abundance of linked cross-references). David Instone-Brewer's introduction to Str-B provides a helpful history, appreciation, and warning: "No New Testament scholar should limit themselves by working without the riches of Strack-Billerbeck, but the benefits of these heights require careful attention to this preflight safety warning" (v. 3, p. xxxvi. in the translation). A couple of thoughts initially: 1. This resource makes me want even MORE primary text material in Logos. For instance, the Minor Tractates of the Talmud, Sipra Leviticus, Sipre Numbers, Sipre Deuteronomy, Seder Olam Rabbah, Megillat Taanit, Midrash Rabbah, Seder Elijah Rabbah, Pesiqta Rabbati, Midrash Tanchuma, Midrash Tehillin, Pirqe Rabbi Eliezer, Seder 'Olam Zuta, Chronicle of Jerahmeel, etc. 2. Volumes 1 & 2 cannot come soon enough (given the heavy use of cross-referencing), and the excurses of volume 4 are surely important as well. 3. It is a fine time to be interested in this kind of study! I remember pouring over Str-B in seminary! Having the text in English and thoroughly hyperlinked is awesome. 4. David Instone-Brewer needs to finish TRENT. :) Sure. Be careful. Avoid parallelomania. Take into account the discoveries of the Qumran documents, etc. Avoid the mistakes of the "Old Perspective" on Paul, and be careful to heed recent scholarship on the date of various documents. Still, this promises to be an invaluable resource to those interested in New Testament backgrounds.
        1. Thanks for the review. Can you explain your comment, "David Instone-Brewer needs to finish TRENT"?
        2. Got it: Traditions of the Rabbis in the Era of the New Testament
      3. Content is helpful and worthwhile, but the structuring of the resource is disappointing, given the price-point. I expected the document to sync automatically with the IBHS sections, but the proper milestones are not added to the current structure of the document. :(
        1. Why James Darlack, how are you? David Ricci
        2. I'm doing well David! How's life at Northpoint?
        3. Good, thank you. Life at NP is going well. It's been nice 'bumping into' you. (I too cut my teeth on BW. It's missed. Now I still work with BW 10 and Logos 10. I am sure I am not as good at it as you are.) Take care. David
      4. I'm glad to see that the recent update included hyperlinking for all of the witnesses, so that one can easily see the date and description of the witnesses. It would be helpful to have other sigla linked as well (e.g., the diamond [♦ represents "variants that were in the eyes of the editors extremely close contenders for consideration for the main text"], or superscript numbers / asterisks [e.g., A* A² A³], or ᵛⁱᵈ with dots under the Greek letters). This is more of a critique of the THGNT rather than the Logos version, given that the explanations of these sigla are embedded in the text of the "Introduction."