I am currently undertaking a one-year study of the Harmony of the Gospels using all 10 available Harmonies in my library. I enjoy Mark Moore's "The Chronological Life of Christ, revised ed." It is the Harmony I start my daily study with. There is one thing I do not care for, though. In an effort (I assume) to make his book more relatable to today's younger generation Mark Moore often uses contemporary somewhat juvenile popular language in his commentary. Here are some of the many examples of his comments. On Jn 4:43-45: "Small town boy goes to the big city and beats up the big-wigs." or "...he comes to Galilee with a little fame under his belt..." (pg 111). On Lk 4:16-31a: "Here he went to school, learned a trade, competed in sports, etc. He was the hometown boy, making it big." (pg 114). Although not a big issue, I personally prefer a more scholarly tone. Another thing I immediately noticed is the fact that "The Chronological Life of Christ" appears to somewhat follow the outline, method and pattern employed in "The Four-Fold Gospel" by Philip Y. Pendleton and John William McGarvey. Matter of fact, frequently the commentaries in both Harmonies appears very similar, almost as if some phrases have been copied and slightly paraphrases from "The Four-Fold Gospel" Harmony's commentary. The introduction to Mark Moore's work states that it is based on the "NIV Harmony of the Gospels" by Thomas and Gundry and makes no mention of using "The Four-Fold Gospel", though, which is a much earlier work. In all, "The Chronological Life of Christ, revised ed." is still worth reading. It is is not the first work to put the Gospels in chronological order, but aside from providing a deeper understanding of Christ's life and ministry, it offers a lot of additional religious, historical, and cultural information of interest. I would recommend this work to others.