• I wrote in a review of this excellent book on Sacra Doctrina's Thomistica website in 2017: "Thomas’s biblical theology is a much-underappreciated facet of his theology, but the increasing availability of his commentaries are bringing his biblical theology more to the fore. Smith's text further illustrates Thomas’s mode of exegesis within the context of preaching the faith." It's too long of a review to copy and paste here. Head over to Thomistica if you want to read the rest of it.
    1. Please note that there are no so-called 'Deuterocanonical' texts in this Arabic Bible, which should be noted in the description above. I bought this but it is not quite what I am looking for. It is unfortunate that Logos does not have a complete Arabic Bible of use to Arabic-reading Orthodox and Eastern Catholics.
      1. Glad to have these scans in Logos. However, it's just so disappointing. We've been waiting on the full PG for over a decade. There's probably grant money just sitting out there waiting on someone from Logos to apply for it. What a huge win for the digital humanities it could be. Alas.
        1. Glad to have these scans in Logos. However, it's just so disappointing. We've been waiting on the full PG for over a decade. There's probably grant money just sitting out there waiting on someone from Logos to apply for it. What a huge win for the digital humanities it could be. Alas.
          1. I found this book in my collection after a software upgrade. Verbum should definitely not mainstream this one. There are some valuable insights in the book, such as "it is ideal to have a well-trained spiritual director that is also your confessor." Indeed. Elsewhere, however, the advice is confused or even misleading. The authors write that "it is up to the seeker to search out and find the soul that God has waiting for them." Spiritual direction, however, should not be approached in such a romanticized way. That could lead to a sense that the director speaks and directs for God, which seems to be the authors' position. The authors give some really questionable advice on docility and obedience in spiritual direction. To be clear, docility and obedience are suited to the clerical and spiritual life with qualifications, of course, but not to lay spiritual direction, at least not as the authors describe it. Especially in the laity's seeking spiritual direction, they owe no obedience to directors. Should a directee be obedient "even when we disagree or don’t completely understand"? The authors say they should. No, that is incorrect. A lay person should never follow spiritual counsel they disagree with. Understanding should precede action in the spiritual life. The spiritual director should be completely detached from whether the lay directee follows his or her counsel. Also, spiritual directors should not charge a fee. The author claims not to take a position, but roundaboutly does by encouraging it, saying, "our generosity is a reflection of the health of our souls, and for the health of our souls we should be particularly generous with anyone willing to invest their time in our spiritual well-being." I have increasingly found that directors are charging fees because of these reasons. What makes this book most deficient are its omissions: It gives very little guidance regarding the preservation of healthy boundaries, what sorts of limits the director should recognize, how to prevent spiritual co-dependencies, how to discern red flags (such as narcissism) in a potential spiritual director, nothing on whether there should be expectations of confidentiality, mandatory reporting (what if a directee admits child abuse, for example), level of theological education a director should have (in my opinion, S.T.L. or accredited Master's, at a minimum), etc. The authors suggest that seeking an educated director is an example of pride (p. 20); however, they forget that St. Teresa of Avila so strongly valued the erudition of her spiritual director that her director was the Spanish Dominican Domingo Báñez, professor at the famed Salamanca. Kudos to the authors for addressing a lacuna in the literature, and there are some goods here, such as appendix II, but I cannot recommend this text to anyone. Faithlife also needs to remove bad links (I see they took out the link in the book to Regnum Christi), as they need to remove the one to Fr. John McCloskey's website (do NOT click on that link!).
            1. This is an excellent work for those who want an introduction to Maximus and a sampling of his works. For Verbum development, I would suggest moving the notation of Centuries on Charity in this work and in Sherwood's from page numbers to the following format: Car 2.53. That way, Berthold's and Sherwood's (and anyone else's) can be linked for Maximus scholars who want to compare translations.
              1. Sure, I'm biased. CUA has done a fine job with this series, and I'm glad to see Verbum adding it.
                1. OK... I was hesitating to pull the trigger, but you've convinced me. I hope you get a decent cut.
              2. Ideal resource for professors in Catholic seminary. I've used this as a textbook for multiple courses I've taught at the seminary level.
                1. This resource is a must for Catholic professors of Sacred Scripture.
                  1. I have found this to be an indispensable resource for translating texts in the patristics era, as it serves as something of a supplement to the "Great Scott," going over and beyond by tracing the subtleties of the patristic development of language throughout the centuries. Bid and share.