Michael Wolfe
Lesson 1 – Greek Rhetoric
CM100 – Class Essay
Comparison of
Rhetorical Styles
Introduction:
The classic Greek
style of oral discourse using rhetoric as a way to convince and move an
audience is easily transferable to sermons written today. My essay will be centered on this topic. Cicero’s development of the three styles and
further expansion utilizing the five cannons deepens my understanding of the
correct sermon structure. This will help me to successfully lead my
congregation to a decision for change.
The Power of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos in Sermon Building
Ethos:
The utilization
of Ethos in the beginning of a sermon
establishes my credibility as well as the topic of the sermon. I first
introduce my topic and then follow up with the scriptures that verify it. What
I have found useful is to continue to use this pattern of Ethos throughout the
entire sermon. Utilizing Ethos as a
continual flow throughout my sermon establishes the credibility of myself, my
topic, and the scriptures themselves.
Logos:
Using
Logos I fully expand on and bring to life the topic by developing each thought.
Intriguing the listener with the details of the thought is my chief goal. The
scripture must draw in and explain in such detail that the hearer is persuaded
to consider how this topic is relevant to their own lives. Through their
intellect I am appealing to their understanding of each point of fact. This
allows a deeper level of sermon development.
Pathos:
As I integrate
the third aspect of rhetorical preaching, Pathos, which is my personal
favorite, I am speaking to appeal to them emotionally. In this I want them to be drawn to the
importance of personal application of the sermon topic( or their need of
salvation), pressing in with pleading and an emotionally charged proclamation
of the Gospel message of Jesus Christ.
Throughout this
course study I have seen the many famous preachers using all three rhetorical
methods. The simplicity of using ethos to introduce, logos to expound in the
main body, and pathos drawing the sermon to a close with emotionally charged
persuasion is applicable to all people throughout the ages.
The Styles of Cicero
The way
Cicero developed the three styles by building upon its foundation is a
crucial feature of the text and the future of preaching. These were the Plain
Style, Middle Style, and Grand Style from the Greek aspects of rhetoric (Ethos,
Logos, and Pathos). I am comparing the
original Greek Rhetoric style directly against Ciscero’s three styles and how
he built upon them with the five canons.
Plain Style
This
style was used to establish proof and the genuineness of the speech, argument
or text. Much like Ethos its purpose was to convince the audience of the
trustworthiness and the character of the speaker and the text or argument. By
this, the legitimacy of the topic is established.
Middle Style
This
was used in the argument or preaching of a text for the pleasure and
entertainment of the audience. The middle style is closely related but not
precisely the same as Logos (in which is the actual development of patterns of
thought) to was to used to convince, persuade, and appeal to the audience. Logos was not entertainment, yet it was still
a way to sway the audience by proofs and reasoning as opposed to the
entertainment Cicero utilized in the Middle Style.
Grand Style
Moving
the audience to a point of decision was the purpose of the Grand Style. It was
not to entertain or to humor the audience but to bring them to point of
decision in favor of his opinion. It was not flowery and flamboyant but
convincing and laden with proof and thus aimed at this moving the hearers to
the point of decision as the orator called them to do. Pathos has the identical
purpose except this is a call to an emotionally charged decision instead of a
logical one.
Looking beyond
these foundational styles I see Cicero laying down rhetorical principles as
guidelines and disciples to keep the speaker following the rhetorical outline.
The Five Canonical Disciplines
Invention,
arrangement, style, memory, and delivery were all guidelines which kept the ebb
and flow of the rhetorical argument flowing with continuity and an easily
followed logic to convince others of strongly held beliefs.
As I see the
great preachers throughout history I recognize all the elements of rhetorical
style within their sermons from their various preaching styles. I am thankful
for the contributions of the early church fathers, as they have enhanced my own
personal convictions and style.

Michael — Edited
In transition from my Word document to this site, my APA format was mangled. Please excuse the disorder.